Canada

Bypassing Provincial Wait Times Legally: How Canadians Are Using Private Care Abroad

6 min read By Dr. Munaf Ahmad Ansari

The wait time numbers behind this trend are worse than most Canadians expect until they’re the one waiting. The median time from a family doctor referral to actually receiving treatment hit 28.6 weeks nationally in 2025 — the second-longest wait on record, and roughly three times the 9.3-week wait measured back in 1993. Orthopedic surgery specifically averaged 48.6 weeks referral-to-treatment. That’s the real backdrop behind why more Canadians are looking at private treatment abroad — and the two questions that actually matter are whether it’s legal, and whether any of it comes back to you financially. Here’s both, straight.

What the Wait Time Data Actually Shows

According to CIHI’s most recent national reporting, only 61% of Canadians received a knee replacement within the 26-week benchmark in 2024, down from 70% before the pandemic, and only 68% received hip replacements within the 6-month target. Provincial variation is significant: the Fraser Institute’s 2025 survey found the shortest specialist-to-treatment waits in Ontario, while provinces like New Brunswick and Quebec ran considerably longer. Assuming each person waits for only one procedure, an estimated 3.3% of the entire Canadian population was waiting for treatment in 2025, ranging from 2.5% in Ontario to 7.8% in Newfoundland and Labrador.

These aren’t cosmetic delays. CIHI’s own reporting notes that median wait times for most cancer surgeries increased between 2019 and 2024, and the proportion of patients receiving radiation therapy within the recommended 28-day window and hip fracture repair within 48 hours both dropped compared to pre-pandemic levels. This is the actual, documented context — not a talking point — behind why the “go private, go abroad” conversation has moved from fringe to mainstream in Canada.

This is the part that gets muddled in most coverage. Nothing in Canadian law prevents a Canadian citizen from traveling abroad and paying privately for medical treatment. The confusion usually stems from a different question: whether Canadians can buy private insurance to cover services that are also covered by their provincial plan — and that’s precisely what the landmark 2005 Supreme Court case Chaoulli v. Quebec addressed.

In that case, Dr. Jacques Chaoulli and patient George Zeliotis — who had been stuck on a hip replacement waiting list — challenged Quebec’s ban on private health insurance for services also covered by the provincial Medicare plan. The Supreme Court ruled 4–3 that the prohibition violated Quebecers’ rights under the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms, specifically because excessive wait times were found to jeopardize patients’ security of person. Because the ruling relied on the Quebec Charter rather than a majority finding under the Canadian Charter, it legally applies only in Quebec — but the case remains the definitive precedent on the underlying question, and Quebec has since permitted private insurance for select procedures including hip and knee replacements and cataract surgery as a direct result.

What Chaoulli didn’t need to establish, because it was never actually prohibited, is a Canadian’s right to pay out of pocket for private treatment outside the country. That’s always been legal. The real practical question isn’t “can I do this” — it’s “will any of it be reimbursed.”

The Reimbursement Question: What Actually Comes Back

This is where the honest answer disappoints most people who go looking for it. Provincial health plans do not reimburse elective treatment sought abroad simply because the wait at home was too long. Reimbursement is possible, but only through a specific, narrow pathway that exists in every province under different names — in Ontario, it’s the Out-of-Country Prior Approval Program administered through OHIP.

Ontario’s criteria are representative of what most provinces require. For OHIP to fund out-of-country treatment, your Ontario physician must submit a prior approval application demonstrating that the requested service:

  • Is generally accepted in Ontario as appropriate for your specific medical circumstances;
  • Is performed at a licensed hospital or health facility, and is not experimental, part of a research trial, or a survey;
  • Is either not available in Ontario by an identical or equivalent procedure, or is available in Ontario, but a delay in receiving it would result in death or medically significant, irreversible tissue damage.

Notice what’s specifically excluded: a long wait time alone, for a procedure that is available in Ontario, does not meet this bar unless the delay itself would cause irreversible harm. This is a meaningfully higher standard than “I’ve been waiting eight months and I’m frustrated” — it requires your physician to document that the specific delay poses serious medical risk, not just discomfort or inconvenience. If you proceed without this written prior approval, the Ministry is explicit: you are responsible for the entire cost, and no after-the-fact appeal based on a good outcome will change that.

If approved, you’ll receive a decision letter specifying the approved services, the specific facility authorized to provide them, and any service limits. If your application is denied, most provinces offer either an internal review or a formal hearing (in Ontario, before the Health Services Appeal and Review Board) — but the wait for that appeals process is itself a real timeline cost worth factoring in before assuming this route will be fast.

What This Means in Practice

For the large majority of Canadians pursuing private treatment abroad for a standard elective procedure — a hip or knee replacement that’s simply taking too long, not one where delay risks irreversible harm — provincial reimbursement is very unlikely to apply. The realistic expectation should be self-pay, with reimbursement treated as a genuine but narrow exception rather than the default outcome.

The cases most likely to actually qualify for OHIP-style reimbursement are the ones where a specialist is willing to formally document that the specific delay you’re facing crosses into medically significant, irreversible risk — which is a clinical judgment call your physician has to be willing to put in writing, not something a patient can request based on frustration with a wait list alone.

What to Actually Do Before Booking Anything

  • Ask your specialist directly whether your case could meet the prior-approval bar — specifically, whether the wait itself risks irreversible harm, not just prolonged discomfort. If yes, the prior approval application should be your first step, before any travel booking.
  • Check your specific province’s program, since the name, criteria, and appeals process vary — Ontario’s OHIP Out-of-Country Prior Approval Program isn’t identical to Quebec’s, British Columbia’s, or Alberta’s equivalents.
  • Assume self-pay as the default and evaluate the cost of private treatment abroad on that basis, treating any reimbursement as a bonus rather than a plan.
  • Get everything in writing before you travel — a verbal indication from a caseworker is not the same as the formal decision letter, and traveling before receiving that letter puts the full cost risk on you.

This article summarizes publicly available data from CIHI, the Fraser Institute, Ontario’s Ministry of Health, and published legal analysis of Chaoulli v. Quebec, current as of 2026. It is not legal or medical advice. Provincial reimbursement rules, wait time data, and appeals processes change and vary by province — confirm current requirements directly with your provincial health ministry and treating physician before making travel or treatment decisions.

← Back to The Journal